التقييم العددي والتجريبي لأداء MPPT في نظام PV بقدرة 50 وات باستخدام وحدة التحكم في شحن الطاقة الشمسية ML2440.

محتوى المقالة الرئيسي

Enas G. Faisal
Shaymaa A. Mahdi
Emad T. Hashim

الملخص

تُقدم هذه الدراسة تحقيقًا تجريبيًا وعدديًا مشتركًا لأداء لوح شمسي بقدرة 50 واط باستخدام وحدة التحكم ML2440 لتتبع نقطة القدرة القصوى (MPPT) تحت ظروف إشعاع شمسي مختلفة وأحمال مقاومية متنوعة. تم تحليل ثلاث حالات تشغيل: بدون تتبع، وحمل مقاومة بقيمة 90 أوم، وآخر بقيمة 115 أوم. تم حساب القدرة النظرية والكفاءة باستخدام بيانات الإشعاع الشمسي ودرجة حرارة اللوح وخصائص الوحدة، ومقارنتها بالنتائج التجريبية لتقييم دقة النموذج وفعالية وحدة التحكم. سُجلت أعلى قدرة خرج تجريبية بلغت 49.70 واط عند إشعاع 1000 واط/م² باستخدام مقاومة 115 أوم، متقاربة جدًا مع القدرة النظرية البالغة 50.30 واط، بنسبة خطأ نسبي لم تتجاوز 1.2%. أما حالة عدم التتبع، فقد حققت قدرة قصوى قدرها 46.51 واط، مع انحراف ملحوظ عن القيم النظرية. أظهر تحليل الجذر التربيعي لمتوسط الخطأ (RMSE) أن حالة عدم التتبع سجلت أعلى القيم (7.92 واط للقدرة، و2.84% للكفاءة)، في حين سجلت حالتا 90 أوم و115 أوم قيمًا أقل بشكل ملحوظ (4.12 واط و1.87% على التوالي). تؤكد هذه النتائج فعالية وحدة التحكم ML2440 في تحسين أداء النظام الشمسي من خلال التتبع الأمثل لنقطة القدرة القصوى، كما تُثبت دقة النموذج العددي المُطور كأداة موثوقة لتقييم وتحليل أداء الأنظمة الكهروضوئية.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.displayStats.downloads##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.displayStats.noStats##

تفاصيل المقالة

القسم

Articles

كيفية الاقتباس

"التقييم العددي والتجريبي لأداء MPPT في نظام PV بقدرة 50 وات باستخدام وحدة التحكم في شحن الطاقة الشمسية ML2440". (2026) مجلة الهندسة, 32(3), ص 209–231. doi:10.31026/j.eng.2026.03.12.

المراجع

Abdel-Salam, A.K., Ahmed, S. and Elserougi, A., 2022. Experimental assessment of low-power photovoltaic systems with resistive load matching under variable irradiance, Energy Reports, 8, pp. 5861–5872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.04.108

Abdel-Salam, A.K., Massoud, A.M., Ahmed, S. and Enjeti, P.N., 2021. High-performance adaptive perturb and observe MPPT technique for photovoltaic-based systems, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 36(1), pp. 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2020.2992347

Ahmed, M.M., Hassan, A. and Khalil, A., 2021. Utilization of device parameters to assess the performance of a monocrystalline solar module under varied temperature and irradiance, Solar Energy, 228, pp. 307–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.09.028

Ahmad, F.F., Said, Z. and Hachicha, A.A., 2022. Experimental performance evaluation of closed-loop mist/fog cooling system for photovoltaic module application, Energy Conversion and Management: X, 14, P. 100226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2022.100226

Ali, M., Mekhilef, S. and Seyedmahmoudian, M., 2021. Review of maximum power point tracking techniques under partial shading condition, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 143, P. 110905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110905

Al-Ghezi, M.K.S., Ahmed, R.T. and Chaichan, M.T., 2022. Influence of temperature and irradiance on the performance of photovoltaic panels in Iraq, International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 11(2), pp. 501–513. https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.2022.43713

Alik, A. and Jusoh, A., 2021. An enhanced P&O MPPT algorithm for PV systems under fast-changing solar irradiation, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 130, P. 106988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.106988

Alnahhal, A.I., Halal, A. and Plesz, B., 2022. Temperature-dependent performance of concentrated monocrystalline silicon solar cells, in Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 28th International Symposium for Design and Technology in Electronic Packaging (SIITME), pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIITME55367.2022.9944485

Aslam, A., Ahmed, N., Qureshi, S.A., Assadi, M. and Ahmed, N., 2022. Advances in solar PV systems: A comprehensive review of PV performance, influencing factors, and mitigation techniques, Energies, 15(20), P. 7595. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15207595

Belhachat, F. and Larbes, C., 2022. Comprehensive review on MPPT techniques for photovoltaic systems subjected to partial shading conditions, Solar Energy, 230, pp. 341–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.10.033

Benlahbib, B. and Bouarroudj, N., 2022. Experimental modeling and validation of PV module performance considering temperature and load variation, Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 35, P. 102089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2022.102089

Duffie, J.A. and Beckman, W.A., 2013. Solar engineering of thermal processes, 4th ed. Wiley.

El Aroudi, A., Benadero, L., Ponce, E. and Martínez-Salamero, L., 2021. Stability analysis of MPPT algorithms in PV systems, IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, 9(2), pp. 2141–2152. https://doi.org/10.1109/JESTPE.2020.3006944

Elgendy, M.A., Zahawi, B. and Atkinson, D.J., 2021. Assessment of perturb and observe MPPT algorithm implementation techniques for PV pumping applications, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 12(2), pp. 1076–1087. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2020.3038796

Eltamaly, A.M., Alolah, A.I. and Farh, H.M., 2021. Fast and efficient photovoltaic MPPT technique under rapidly changing environmental conditions, Energy Reports, 7, pp. 3376–3386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.05.058

Esram, T. and Chapman, P.L., 2007. Comparison of photovoltaic array maximum power point tracking techniques, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 22(2), pp. 439–449.

Fatima, K., Minai, A.F., Malik, H. and García Márquez, F.P., 2024. Experimental analysis of dust composition impact on photovoltaic panel performance: A case study, Solar Energy, 267, P. 112206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2023.112206

Haddouche, K., Rekioua, D. and Matagne, E., 2021. Experimental study of PV system efficiency improvement using optimized load and MPPT, Energy Procedia, 162, pp. 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2021.03.028

Hassan, Q., Jaszczur, M. and Abdulateef, A.M., 2022. Experimental investigation of photovoltaic module performance under different operating conditions, Energy, 239, P. 122315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122315

Huot, A., Roux, D., Koubli, Y. and Belarbi, R., 2021. Performance investigation of tempered glass-based monocrystalline and polycrystalline PV modules under various irradiance levels’, International Journal of Photoenergy, 2021, P. 6692286. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6692286

Koutroulis, E., Kalaitzakis, K. and Voulgaris, N.C., 2001. Development of a microcontroller-based photovoltaic MPPT control system, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 16(1), pp. 46–54.

Kumar, R., Bansal, A. and Pachauri, R.K., 2023. Real-time experimental validation of MPPT algorithms for small-scale photovoltaic systems, Measurement, 213, P. 112741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2023.112741

Lin, H., Yu, D., Zhao, J., Liu, Y., Liu, C. and Xu, C., 2023. Influence of outdoor conditions on PV module performance: An overview’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 178, P. 113208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113208

Loukriz, A., Haddadi, M. and Messalti, S., 2022. Simulation and experimental comparison of MPPT techniques for photovoltaic systems’, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 134, P. 107366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.107366

Mahdavi, M. and Babaei, E., 2023. Outdoor experimental validation of photovoltaic systems using classical MPPT controllers’, Electrical Engineering, 105, pp. 2157–2169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-023-01864-2

McEvoy, A., Markvart, T., & Castañer, L. 2012. Practical Handbook of Photovoltaics. In Practical Handbook of Photovoltaics (2nd ed.). https://doi.org/10.1016/C2011-0-05723-X

Messenger, R. and Ventre, J., 2010. Photovoltaic systems engineering, 3rd ed. CRC Press.

Motahhir, S., El Hammoumi, A. and El Ghzizal, A., 2021. The most used MPPT algorithms: Review and suitable low-cost embedded implementation, Solar Energy, 216, pp. 328–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.12.017

Priyadarshi, N., Padmanaban, S., Holm-Nielsen, J.B. and Blaabjerg, F., 2021. Experimental validation of hybrid MPPT techniques for photovoltaic systems under fast-changing irradiance, IEEE Systems Journal, 15(3), pp. 3977–3988. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2020.3037350

Radziemska, E., 2003. Effect of temperature on the power drop in crystalline silicon solar cells, Renewable Energy, 28(1), pp. 1–12.

Rehman, A.U., Ahmad, I. and Khan, S., 2023. Performance evaluation of photovoltaic modules with MPPT under outdoor conditions, Renewable Energy Focus, 45, pp. 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2023.01.006

Rezk, H., Tyukhov, I. and Raupov, N., 2022. Experimental comparison of MPPT techniques for photovoltaic systems under real outdoor conditions, Energy Reports, 8, pp. 1120–1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.031

Saleheen, M.Z., Salema, A.A., Islam, S.M.M., Sarimuthu, C.R. and Hasan, M.Z., 2021. A target-oriented performance assessment and model development of a grid-connected solar PV (GCPV) system for a commercial building in

Malaysia, Renewable Energy, 171, pp. 371–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.02.108

Sharma, A. and Saxena, A., 2024. Statistical error analysis of photovoltaic systems under MPPT control using RMSE and MAPE metrics, Solar Energy, 270, P. 112390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2024.112390

Skoplaki, E. and Palyvos, J.A., 2009. Temperature dependence of photovoltaic module performance, Solar Energy, 83(5), pp. 614–624.

Tey, K.S. and Mekhilef, S., 2023. Modified incremental conductance MPPT algorithm to mitigate steady-state oscillations, Solar Energy, 252, pp. 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2023.01.012

Villalva, M.G., Gazoli, J.R. and Filho, E.R., 2009. Comprehensive modeling and simulation of photovoltaic arrays, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 24(5), pp. 1198–1208.

Youssef, A. and Kanaan, H.Y., 2024. Performance benchmarking of low-power photovoltaic systems under MPPT operation in hot climates, Energy Reports, 10, pp. 4121–4134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.02.067

المؤلفات المشابهة

يمكنك أيضاً إبدأ بحثاً متقدماً عن المشابهات لهذا المؤلَّف.